Date: Sat, 24 Dec 1994 17:20:28 +0000 (GMT) From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.sax.de Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/rc.shutdown (First shot) Message-ID: <9412242320.AA02541@brasil.moneng.mei.com> In-Reply-To: <199412242134.WAA19425@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> from "J Wunsch" at Dec 24, 94 10:34:37 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Erm (not that i'd vote against Ollivier's changes), but innd is being > shut down cleanly for me since init sends a SIGTERM when going down. > At least, it doesn't complain at startup time about an unclean > shutdown. That gives INN about, um, 10 seconds to clean up and go away? That is not good (I don't know about anybody else, but all the news servers I work with have newsfeeds countable in terms of dozens, and 10 seconds on a busy box is nothing, particularly if you've just signalled TERM to fifty nntplink processes that are now all trying to write out batch files). However, I am not arguing _for_ Ollivier's changes, by any stretch of the imagination. If you type "shutdown" without bothering to take down INN and make sure all's well, you darn well get what you deserve. I'm not a fan of the SVR4-style 10-trillion-shell-script crud (Solaris is horrible), and I'd just as soon prefer to keep it simple. ;-) JMHO. ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342-4847
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9412242320.AA02541>