Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 15:51:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: ache@nagual.pp.ru Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lorder problem: aout vs. elf (and GNU Configure problem too) Message-ID: <199806052051.PAA00410@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <19980605150554.B15856@nagual.pp.ru> (message from =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= on Fri, 5 Jun 1998 15:05:54 %2B0400) References: <19980605123736.A20838@nagual.pp.ru> <199806051051.SAA00749@spinner.netplex.com.au> <19980605150554.B15856@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> /usr/lib/libc.a (now moved to /usr/lib/aout) is also often parsed by GNU >>> Configure :-( >> Huh?? Such as? Almost all the GNU configure scripts test for presense of >> libc routines by a compile attempt. I've never seen an autoconf script > Yes, but I see at least three times when /usr/lib/libc.so.3.1 will > be nm'ed by Configure. I can't remember which ports affected right now, > but soon somebody hit in this and we'll see... If these are GNU programs, please let me know. GNU programs generally shouldn't rely on compilation internals like that. Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806052051.PAA00410>