Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:31:06 +0000 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which make in freebsd? Message-ID: <20031103213106.GB41848@clan.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpznfdeth8.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20031102010136.44997855.beyert@cs.ucr.edu> <xzpfzh6apma.fsf@dwp.des.no> <3FA5EC15.2C7F1656@emailrob.com> <xzpznfdeth8.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> rob spellberg <emailrob@emailrob.com> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> > > gmake is inferior in most ways that matter.
> > why?
>=20
> Most noticeably, the lack of .for / .endfor.
No equivalent for .USE, at least the last time I looked, is a pain.
cf. http://www.daemonnews.org/199907/managing.html
N
--=20
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ (__)
FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ \\\'',)
\/ \=
^
--- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- .\._/=
_)
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/pskak6gHZCw343URAooeAJ46YcIjOBVfLlvlmpCg5VHuUo5M0wCfRho+
Lvc+RLwZB3E0Qib36zYd48Y=
=pbHR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031103213106.GB41848>