Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 21:03:40 -0500 From: "C. Stephen Gunn" <csg@dustdevil.waterspout.com> To: wollman@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 802.1Q VLANs Message-ID: <20000214210340.B16731@dustdevil.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <20000214202434.A16731@dustdevil.waterspout.com> References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0002031711230.1338-100000@haddock.euitt.upm.es> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002031236160.479-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <200002031847.NAA62013@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20000214002142.A12511@dustdevil.waterspout.com> <200002141625.LAA65769@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20000214125527.A14822@dustdevil.waterspout.com> <200002141935.OAA66996@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20000214202434.A16731@dustdevil.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I see an administrative advantage to having your configuration be > similar on all bridges or hosts that understand tagged frames. > That's the motivation for my comments. I also, after re-reading your message several times, and talking it over with Matthew Dodd, realized that I'm somewhat confused on the configuration/default-port-vlan issue. I do know this: I hate Cisco & their documentation.... - Steve -- C. Stephen Gunn URL: http://www.waterspout.com/ WaterSpout Communications, Inc. Email: csg@waterspout.com 427 North 6th Street Phone: +1 765.742.6628 Lafayette, IN 47901 Fax: +1 765.742.0646 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000214210340.B16731>