Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:52:08 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Message-ID: <20071213185208.GA3955@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <200712130008.lBD082lO095232@repoman.freebsd.org> <200712112000.lBBK0tc3073820@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200712130008.lBD082lO095232@repoman.freebsd.org> <200712112000.lBBK0tc3073820@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-12-11 20:00, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Don't assume that make(1) is a bsd-like make program. It might not
> be. This only matters in the early stages of bootstrapping, of
> course, but gnu make can't handle bsd make Makefiles at all if they
> use any of the 'dot' directives, which src/Makefile has in abudnance.
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.343 +5 -3 src/Makefile
On 2007-12-13 00:08, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote:
> We don't need to invent BSDMAKE. ${MAKE} is sufficient.
>
> Submitted by: jmallet@
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.344 +2 -3 src/Makefile
Cool! That sounds like a step in a good direction, so we can override
BSDMAKE in the first stages when /usr/bin/make is, say, gmake :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071213185208.GA3955>