Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:13:44 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unexpected softupdate inconsistency Message-ID: <20040313131344.78952b16.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <pan.2004.03.12.21.16.09.893788@web.de> References: <pan.2004.03.10.07.27.44.911448@web.de> <c2nfvh$g7q$1@sea.gmane.org> <20040310184431.U82999@carver.gumbysoft.com> <pan.2004.03.11.05.28.59.426902@web.de> <20040311174814.31867102.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <pan.2004.03.12.21.16.09.893788@web.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:16:12 +0100
Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@web.de> wrote:
> pciconf -lv shows:
> atapci0@pci0:2:5: class=0x010180 card=0x0a411019 chip=0x55131039
> rev=0xd0 hdr=0x00
> vendor = 'Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS)'
> device = 'SiS5513 EIDE Controller (A,B step)'
> class = mass storage
> subclass = ATA
It seems to be the same controller I have (I totally forgot about
pciconf in my last posting):
atapci0@pci0:2:5: class=0x01018a card=0x55131039 chip=0x55131039
rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS)'
device = 'SiS5513 EIDE Controller (A,B step)'
class = mass storage
subclass = ATA
> and dmesg | grep atapci shows:
> atapci0: <SiS 5591 ATA100 controller> port 0x400
> 0-0x400f at device 2.5 on pci0
Hmm, do you run with the (broken) patch I reffered to in my last
posting, or without?
I wonder if the controller would report differently in dmesg without the
patch. Oh well, it probably doesn't make any sense, because I need the
patch to make FreeBSD run on my setup.
--
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Norway
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040313131344.78952b16.torfinn.ingolfsen>