Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Aug 2000 01:32:05 +0200
From:      Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: is -STABLE broken ?
Message-ID:  <399B2474.FB12B1C@qualys.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008161450540.17478-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Maxime Henrion wrote:
>
> > It's weird because signal 4 is SIGILL, and means that an illegal
> > instruction has been caught. (exception #6 if I remember right). So it
> > looks like a bug in the compiler.
> > Here is my uname -a ouput :
>
> You forgot to mention what CPU - most likely thing is that you built the
> compiler using CPU optimizations which dont work for your CPU, like using
> -march=pentium on a 486 :-)
>

Well it's a K6-2 one. But i've not compiled cc with optimization flags,
I only have CFLAGS=-O -pipe in my /etc/make.conf

Mux



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?399B2474.FB12B1C>