Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:31:15 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: U60 doesn't boot anymore with -CURRENT Message-ID: <20100613203115.GD68288@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <4C153F8E.1010106@fgznet.ch> References: <4C14ED7C.2030809@fgznet.ch> <20100613191518.GA95797@alchemy.franken.de> <4C1530F1.6070207@fgznet.ch> <20100613201836.GC68288@alchemy.franken.de> <4C153F8E.1010106@fgznet.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:29:02PM +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 13.06.10 22:18, Marius Strobl wrote: > >On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:26:41PM +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote: > >>On 13.06.10 21:15, Marius Strobl wrote: > >>>On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 04:38:52PM +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote: > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>my gecko testmachine refuses to boot with -CURRENT. > >>>> > >>>>Here the verbose part of the messages: > >>>> > >>>>--- > >>>>FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r209123M: Sun Jun 13 14:07:28 CEST 2010 > >>>> > >>>> andreast@u60.andreas.nets:/usr/obj/export/devel/src/sys/GENERIC > >>>> sparc64 > >>>>Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0bbc000. > >>>>real memory = 1610612736 (1536 MB) > >>>>avail memory = 1554571264 (1482 MB) > >>>>machine: SUNW,Ultra-60 > >>>>cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-II Processor (449.99 MHz CPU) > >>>> mask=0xa0 maxtl=5 maxwin=7 > >>>>initalizing intr_countp > >>>>--- > >>>> > >>>>And here it hangs. > >>>> > >>>>Any idea on hwat is going wrong? > >>>> > >>> > >>>Nothing obvious as no sparc64 specific changes went in lately. > >>>If you use a kernel built with options ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER, > >>>can you break into the debugger via the alternate break sequence > >>>on the serial console and get backtrace when it hangs? What is > >>>the last known working revision? Can you bisect which revsion > >>>triggers the problem? > >> > >>I tracked it down to r207537, especially mp_locore.S. > >>If I use r207536 from mp_locore.S then my machine boots again. > >> > > > >Ah, that revision fails to update one branch. Could you please > >give the attached patch a try with current sources? > > Well, there is/was no patch attached. I hope it goes in the direction I > discovered ? > Oops, sorry; yes both patches are identical. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100613203115.GD68288>