Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:53:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> To: vladimir@math.uic.edu Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990825004911.20420h-100000@cygnus.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <19990825033510.26002.qmail@math.uic.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Aug 1999 vladimir@math.uic.edu wrote: > >> Why would solaris machine make a request with vers=4: > >> galois.math.uic.edu -> galileo.math.uic.edu PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100021 (NLM) vers=4 proto=UDP > >> ? > >> (am I right that vers here is the same as the NFS version)? > > > >The NLM version 4 protocol is not supported, I am working on this. > > > >Question: did you delete both checks after the Solaris 2.5 mention? > >or just one? which one? > > > >-Alfred > > > > > > Ah, so vers=4 has nothing to do with NFS's vers 3. From reading the Open Group's XNFS book, NFSv3 clients use the NLM version 4 protocol to gain locks, FreeBSD's rpc.lockd doesn't have stub functions for NLMv4 locking _yet_ :) > > I have deleted both checks. > Interesting... > Please let me know if you need more info or testing done. Soon enough. :) thank you, -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@rush.net|alfred@freebsd.org] Wintelcom systems administrator and programmer - http://www.wintelcom.net/ [bright@wintelcom.net] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990825004911.20420h-100000>