Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:54:17 +0900 From: Byung-Hee HWANG <bh@izb.knu.ac.kr> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE and Emacs port Message-ID: <867hxp4w9y.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr> In-Reply-To: <86vdl9yf8e.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr> (Byung-Hee HWANG's message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:32:01 %2B0900") References: <86tz0upqfx.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr> <87ljm6qi4j.fsf@kobe.laptop> <86vdl9yf8e.fsf@betla.izb.knu.ac.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Byung-Hee HWANG <bh@izb.knu.ac.kr> writes: > Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> writes: > >> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:42:26 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG <bh@izb.knu.ac.kr> wrote: >>> Hello! A few hours ago, Chong Yidong, Emacs maintainer, has been >>> released Emacs 23.1 on gnu.org's mailing lists. Since i use Emacs as >>> default mailer, i really want that FreeBSD Project Release Team to add >>> Emacs 23.1 (Stable Ver.) into FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE. Because i use only >>> -RELEASE branch as far as i possibly can. Then i can use pkg_add >>> instead of ports, so easily. Thanks in advance ..;; >> >> Hi Byung-Hee, >> >> AFAIK, The ports are not frozen yet. I think we can make it by updating >> the port before this weekend. >> >> There is a bit of testing to make sure that we can repo-copy the >> editors/emacs port to editors/emacs22 and check that the new >> editors/emacs port for 23.1 works fine. >> >> I'm working on it, and I will post patches soon-ish :) > > Thanks, Giorgos! Let's fire Emacs gun! > > ... and following is somewhat off topic. FreeBSD Project's SPF rules > marked Giorgos's mail address (keramida@freebsd.org) as > "softfail". That's bad news to me. SPF [RFC4408] is Experimental draft, > you know. Actually Giorgos's mail is very healthy message. Hmm.. i > cannot understand why FreeBSD Project postmaster team adopted such lame > email policy. Please let's go with another policy (e.g., RFC4801). There > is good role model on RFC4801. The Python Project deployed RFC4801 rules > in their own mailing list server, as far as i know. And i heard that is > working very fine ... Oops, i made mistake. The above RFC4801 should be RFC4871. Sorry ;; -- "Sonny, you in there?" "Yeah, Tom, what is it?" -- Tom Hagen and Santino Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 28
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867hxp4w9y.fsf>