Date: Sat, 23 May 1998 15:35:47 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> To: Niall Smart <njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, nick@foobar.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Problem reports closed by Poul-Henning Kamp [was: Re: misc/6712] Message-ID: <19980523153547.A801@ucb.crimea.ua> In-Reply-To: <E0ydD4J-0001dT-00@oak67.doc.ic.ac.uk>; from Niall Smart on Sat, May 23, 1998 at 01:06:31PM %2B0100 References: <phk@FreeBSD.ORG> <E0ydD4J-0001dT-00@oak67.doc.ic.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, I also bothering about this. A number of my PRs with patches made against RELENG_2_2 were committed into -current only, and these PRs were then closed. I think, Poul, you shouldn't just close a PR, if you close it only for -current. Instead, you can just change the synopsis, for example: Old Synopsis: Problem New Synopsis: [RELENG_2_2] Problem Thanks for your assistance, On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 01:06:31PM +0100, Niall Smart wrote: > On May 23, 12:52am, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > } Subject: Re: misc/6712 > > Synopsis: radacct in /etc/services uses non-standard port number > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > > State-Changed-By: phk > > State-Changed-When: Sat May 23 00:52:26 PDT 1998 > > State-Changed-Why: > > fixed in -current, thanks! > > I've noticed a lot of the new fixes going to current only, is anyone > bothering to keep stable fixed? Most of the problems are trivial to > fix on both, so I'm surprised that this is happening. > > Niall -- Ruslan Ermilov System Administrator ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank +380-652-247647 Simferopol, Crimea 2426679 ICQ Network, UIN To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980523153547.A801>