Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:10:15 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name Message-ID: <20060706011015.GA6677@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <44AC5D39.4010502@gmx.de> References: <44AC5D39.4010502@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I normally run the command > # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time= I got the following output: >=20 > diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has 1.5.0= .07.00) >=20 > It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's just plain bogus. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFErGL2XY6L6fI4GtQRAs57AJ4+DLFXnAO6dIHBRiOQal91mELcDACgnxc7 dAer88nkBxvF8O7Uns7X1Gc= =qioC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060706011015.GA6677>