Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:28:43 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: keramida@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Message-ID: <20071213.122843.-1827343505.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20071213185208.GA3955@kobe.laptop> References: <200712130008.lBD082lO095232@repoman.freebsd.org> <200712112000.lBBK0tc3073820@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071213185208.GA3955@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20071213185208.GA3955@kobe.laptop>
Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> writes:
: On 2007-12-11 20:00, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote:
: > Don't assume that make(1) is a bsd-like make program. It might not
: > be. This only matters in the early stages of bootstrapping, of
: > course, but gnu make can't handle bsd make Makefiles at all if they
: > use any of the 'dot' directives, which src/Makefile has in abudnance.
: >
: > Revision Changes Path
: > 1.343 +5 -3 src/Makefile
:
: On 2007-12-13 00:08, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote:
: > We don't need to invent BSDMAKE. ${MAKE} is sufficient.
: >
: > Submitted by: jmallet@
: >
: > Revision Changes Path
: > 1.344 +2 -3 src/Makefile
:
: Cool! That sounds like a step in a good direction, so we can override
: BSDMAKE in the first stages when /usr/bin/make is, say, gmake :)
Yes. These two changes make it so that one can say 'gerbilmake
buildworld' and have 'gerbilmake' be used for the validation and
bootstrapping FreeBSD's make.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071213.122843.-1827343505.imp>