Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:31:58 +0800 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jack Barnett <jackbarnett@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Firewall Message-ID: <20070501033158.GQ6097@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <20070430105659.C37507@fledge.watson.org> References: <dedb607c0704280508nf2c071dh2f76967999f68696@mail.gmail.com> <20070429112838.GH848@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20070430105659.C37507@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
0n Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:58:18AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>One of the big selling points of IPFW is integration with DUMMYNET, which
>offers bandwidth management facilities not present in the other systems. I
>understand there may be efforts afoot to add DUMMYNET support to other
>firewall packages, but don't have any details. I have to say that DUMMYNET
>is the main selling point for ipfw on my servers -- being able to rate
>limit arbitrary IP addresses, port numbers, etc, both in terms of inbound
>and outbound traffic is invaluable.
eh ? PF has ALTQ built in.
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070501033158.GQ6097>