Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:14:46 -0600
From:      Steve Randall <srandall52@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Message-ID:  <20110202121446.6f6a10cd@locust.local>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim8-Ty-uQasPyosAkrNqcjNRd26-gqHfTxtirLu@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTinCUuWET3dFVzpTRPfAiqG7hfdPJrAxY=OWVxff@mail.gmail.com> <20110202153805.40db05f8@gmail.com> <AANLkTimyB5kw4eKOZEH2xCQX5Hz8OMxSiDHHPnO=df5t@mail.gmail.com> <20110202090329.7ee4a4ab@locust.local> <AANLkTim8-Ty-uQasPyosAkrNqcjNRd26-gqHfTxtirLu@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:57:47 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2011/2/2 Steve Randall <srandall52@gmail.com>:
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
> > Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com>:
> >> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
> >> > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi all
> >> >>
> >> >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
> >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
> >> >> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
> >> >>
> >> >> Can you please test it?
> >> >>
> >> >> by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde and gnome
> >> >> integration. (sorry but my poor CPU already hates enough :))
> >> >>
> >> >> All languages supported are build.
> >> >>
> >> >> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a
> >> >> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3=
h30
> >> >> with java)
> >> >>
> >> >> at this points :
> >> >> there is (I guess) only one remaining problem :
> >> >> which launching libreoffice it can't find it libraries, I haven't
> >> >> decided yet wether to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the wrapper script or =
to
> >> >> add ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib and ldconfig -m
> >> >> ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/base3.3/program
> >> >>
> >> >> maybe it conflicts with openoffice I haven't checked yet.
> >> >>
> >> >> to test it you will need a fresh ports tree (the needed libtextcat
> >> >> modification was committed yesterday thanks thierry@)
> >> >>
> >> >> the mandatory screenshot :
> >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice-3.3.0-final.png
> >> >>
> >> >> I expect to be able to push it in the tree during next week (after
> >> >> finding a good way to deal with the libraries and checked if it
> >> >> conflicts with openoffice)
> >> >>
> >> >> I would like to thanks Robert Nagy from openbsd, he has made all the
> >> >> hard work :), he was also very helpful.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for work!
> >
> > I second that.
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > I have one comment:
> >> >
> >> > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xI libreo
> >> > libreoffice-3.3.0 =C2=A0 Full integrated office productivity suite
> >> >
> >> > now I'm trying `pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0` but got errors:
> >> >
> >> > tiger# pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0
> >> > tar: lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: Cannot stat:=
 No
> >> > such file or directory
> >> > tar:
> >> > lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/deploymentfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No
> >> > such file or directory
> >> >
> >> > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xL libreo |grep basprovfx.uno.so
> >> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so
> >> >
> >> > [tiger@tiger]~%file /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basp=
rovfx.uno.so
> >> > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: cannot
> >> > open `/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so' =
(No
> >> > such file or directory)
> >> >
> >> > tiger# find work/ -type f -name basprovfx.uno.so
> >> > tiger# pwd
> >> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice
> >> >
> >> > broken pkg-plist ?
> >> >
> >> >> regards,
> >> >> Bapt
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > wbr, tiger
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.=
org"
> >> >
> >>
> >> seems like but I really don't know how to figure out what you have or
> >> have not in your box that prevent basprovfx.uno.so and consors to be
> >> built
> >
> > Have you tried building on i386? It looks like you generated the
> > packing list on amd64. I'm not sure if that explains basprovfx.uno.so,
> > but it's definitely a problem.
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> >
> Yes I did try on i386.

I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
counts 178 missing files.

19 have "x86_64" in their paths. These directories do not exist on my
system, but I have directories with "x86" in the names instead. (But
there are 57 such lines in pkg-plist. It looks like each file is listed
three times.)

Also, instead of basprovfx.uno.so, I have basprovfi.uno.so. In fact, it
looks like I have 159 "fi" files, where I see 159 "fx" files in
pkg-plist.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110202121446.6f6a10cd>