Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:55:52 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache Message-ID: <444F89F8.2090405@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060426104242.1209c152.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <20060425090739.8470143f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk> <444E8F8A.9030409@rogers.com> <17487.34074.833134.823847@canoe.dclg.ca> <20060426104242.1209c152.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran wrote: > Lost me here. > > Are you saying 1U units from Sun? Or does Dell have a 1U called a > "Sun"? > > I am pretty-much locked into Dell - decision made by others. Actually, > I've been pretty happy with the Dell HW, but it's a shame they don't > offer AMD servers. > I'm quite sure he was referring to the x64 servers from SUN, tell your boss that Dell does not sell what you need. http://www.sun.com/servers/index.jsp?cat=Sun%20Fire%20x64%20Servers&tab=3 <http://www.sun.com/servers/index.jsp?cat=Sun%20Fire%20x64%20Servers&tab=3>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444F89F8.2090405>