Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.own.mk Message-ID: <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <200710120803.l9C83pLM093240@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200710120803.l9C83pLM093240@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hi, > ru 2007-10-12 08:03:51 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > share/mk bsd.own.mk > Log: > Though it was possible to configure our BIND to build even when > libpthread support isn't present, our maintainer felt it's an > overkill, so instead enforce the BIND dependency on libpthread. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.68 +10 -5 src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk Hmm. Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess the question is more to Doug than to you. I found it usefull especially for (CF) installations where I neither needed pppctl nor any other thing that depended on a threading library but a caching nameserver. Going with a port for this means supporting the ports infrastructure respectively an extra installation procedure. Nothing that can't be done just extra pain;-) So far it was easier to go with just base and live with the size of named. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071012081105.C6043>