Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:56:41 +0200 From: Andrea Brancatelli <abrancatelli@schema31.it> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Problem with Sendmail Mailertable Message-ID: <cee2f4f8f18c21942b7af0c8dd71af2e@schema31.it>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello everybody, Disclaimer: I'm not very sure this is the best place to ask, in case feel free to point me in the right direction. Given this, I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been working ok for a long time. We have a simple mailterable rule that looks like: schema31.it dbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever] That we use to forward mail in LMTP from sendmail to another machine where dbmail is working. Everything works as supposed but today after years of service someone realized the syntax user+mailbox@schema31.it doesn't work as expected. I did a bit of research and debugging and whatever and found out that when a "+" is involved in the mail address mailertable's lookups doesn't seem to work and the mail gets sent to local mailer. I tried even something fancy like .schema31.it dbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever] Or even the plain all catchall . dbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever] But nothing works. Anybody ever stepped on this and got it working? Please, please, please, avoid the "drop sendmail and switch to <whatever>" replies, if I could I would already done it ;-) Thanks a lot. -- Andrea Brancatelli From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 14:57:59 2020 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649E134EC06 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCFd48TZz3RxP; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MEvoGJ012053 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:57:52 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: dim@FreeBSD.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MEvj9C031903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:57:45 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Buildworld and buildkernel with very slow compilation, recently To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, Chris Nehren <cnehren@pobox.com> References: <2D4CD117-99D0-4A03-8FBC-002CDFFE64F9@ellael.org> <5403888.XOh7uYVVfo@behemoth.lan> <BDBC8C51-5C41-473E-A1EB-74BB5A375C54@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Message-ID: <22433b0e-b951-346d-d902-fb608c0c5c7b@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:57:39 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <BDBC8C51-5C41-473E-A1EB-74BB5A375C54@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCFd48TZz3RxP X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.86)[-0.860]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.851]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.79)[-0.792]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:57:59 -0000 22.06.2020 3:56, Dimitry Andric wrote: > One of the upstream problems is that there is not really any > authoritative performance regression log being built up, so it is hard > to see where such regressions were introduced. Somebody then has to > spend a lot of time tracking down each and every regression, and then > attempt to untangle it from the dozens of commits made around the same > time. :) Such project as FreeBSD could become valuable source of information to track such an issue and it's easy to obtain, for example: make buildworld 2>&1 | logger -t buildworld -p user.info This generates timestamps for every line called in process with help of syslogd. It should be easy to compare outputs obtained with same FreeBSD revision but different clang versions, calculate time diffs and sort by diffs descending :-) Same for ports builds, maybe even quicker.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cee2f4f8f18c21942b7af0c8dd71af2e>