Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:55:06 +0100 From: Matthias Rampke <matthias.rampke@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the state of FreeBSD on the SheevaPlug? Message-ID: <31d643301002230655u6fd16d66wfedc6fb33f0d87dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2CEFFBB0-CE3B-4157-B8BE-1DE5459BF663@semihalf.com> References: <31d643301002230334h17c03d0dg9f61b4ed9ae6724b@mail.gmail.com> <2CEFFBB0-CE3B-4157-B8BE-1DE5459BF663@semihalf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:21, Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> wrote: > - the above applies to both 8-STABLE and HEAD > So in terms of SheevaPlug-support, there is no reason not to use 8-STABLE? Netbooting is not really a (permanent) solution for me, since if I had a NFS server permanently on, I'd have no need for a SheevaPlug ... I'll see what I can get to USB-wise. Rafal: is the SD driver available as a patch, as long as it's not in the main tree? Being able to boot from SD cards would be an almost ideal solution, second only to internal flash (which is still way off due to lack of a NAND filesystem, I know). Thanks Rafal for the quick answer (and for porting FreeBSD in the first place)! thx, Matthias
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31d643301002230655u6fd16d66wfedc6fb33f0d87dc>