Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Aug 1997 12:57:06 -0500
From:      Prashant Dongre <pdongre@opentech.stpn.soft.net>
To:        Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@gns.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, bsdnet@lamb.net, Daniel Capo Sobral <dcs@gns.com.br>, Jose Antonio Junio <junior@gns.com.br>, Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@gns.com.br>, Adrian Leguizamon Dantas <adrian@inep.gov.br>, isp@FreeBSD.ORG, dennis@etinc.com
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD up to E1 Gateway Load Balancing
Message-ID:  <33F9DE72.DF5584BD@opentech.stpn.soft.net>
References:  <199708181728.OAA25074@srv1-bsb.gns.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
>         Although, It seems to me that the FreeBSD gateway vs. Cisco trend has
> quite silenced, I would like to get some insights from the "users" on the
> list.
>         I currently use a PM from livingston as a router of a Frac-T1 leased
> line.
> However, constrasting to local telco price constraints, UUNet/Worldcom has
> been offering a very price interesting option for bulk transfers through
> satellite uplinks.
>         So that, I am inclined to order a burstable E1 connection from them.
>         I would like to know what was the conclusion of this thread.
>         I will be using a K6 233Mhz processor with 32/64 Mb (depends) Ram and
> 4
> Gig hd with FreeBSD 2.2-Stable solelly for the purpose of routing/packet
> filtering, so what network cards do I have as an option to finish building
> it?
>         I will be using a Frac-T1 in one of the connections and a satellite
> uplink
> E1 on the other card. The uplink will be delivering my packets at USA, yet
> my local connection delivers them at Brazil. I would like to have load
> balance, so I understand that I will need to study gated to use BGP. I
> might be willing to use two gateways, one for each connection as noted on
> the discussion. Neverthless, I will be using only one to comence.
>         What considerations should I keep in mind? Any troublesome network
> cards?
> Should I be using iBGP or BGP? Any special issues? Please help me. I've
> been following this discussion during the last week but I did not find it
> much elucidative.
>         I apologize if I am being too repetitive, or if I am not using the
> right
> terminology.
>
>         Regards,
>                 Mario Ferreira.
>
> ----
> System Administrator - SysAdm@gns.com.br
> Consultor Tecnico - Mario.Ferreira@gns.com.br
> Personal - Lioux@gns.com.br Lioux@linf.unb.br Lioux@bsdnet.org
> GNS - Global Network Solutions Tec. Ltda
> http://www.gns.com.br/
> ----

1.  JOIN ISP@FREEBSD.ORG  thread you can have a good idea what others are doing
regarding problem like yours.

2. look at http://www.etinc.com and also contact dennis he has got solution for
you.... (I suppose so)

3.  Look at BGP at
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/data/doc/cintrnet/ics/icsbgp4.htm

Prashant




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33F9DE72.DF5584BD>