Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:35:07 -0500 From: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inter-VM networking with FreeBSD under bhyve Message-ID: <099cc2bb-2647-d012-ca27-f57a99b49010@vangyzen.net> In-Reply-To: <201908201547.x7KFlfgO049668@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <201908201547.x7KFlfgO049668@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for the replies, everyone. > Do you have any desired parameters? > Performance Driven? Simplicity? I failed to mention that. I'm interested in performance, especially low CPU overhead. I had tried vale+tap on a stable/12 host, but it wouldn't pass traffic, so I started this thread as a feeler for what was expected to work on which branches. Since then, I updated the host to head, and vale+tap works. I'm very interested in vale+ptnetmap. It seems to be partially committed to head, but not entirely. Is that right? Thanks again. Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?099cc2bb-2647-d012-ca27-f57a99b49010>