Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:04:26 +0300 From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365038 - in head: . accessibility/jovie accessibility/kaccessible accessibility/kdeaccessibility4 accessibility/kmag accessibility/kmousetool accessibility/kmouth arabic/kde4-l10n arch... Message-ID: <86bnrk4rwl.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201408152037.s7FKbXrx086545@svn.freebsd.org> (Matthias Andree's message of "Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:37:33 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <201408152037.s7FKbXrx086545@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Author: mandree > Date: Fri Aug 15 20:37:31 2014 > New Revision: 365038 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/365038 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r365038/ > > Log: > Upgrade OpenEXR and ilmbase to 2.2.0. [...] > Add UPDATING note, and bump PORTREVISION of all dependent ports. The PORTREVISION bump in pretty much all KDE ports looks quite excessive, only x11/kdelibs4 and x11/kde4-runtime depend on OpenEXR. Could you explain why you decided to bump so many ports?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bnrk4rwl.fsf>