Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:12:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com>, Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what was the last patch you sent out? Message-ID: <14773.14047.750044.76586@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009051059330.11930-100000@zeppo.feral.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009051057290.11930-100000@zeppo.feral.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009051059330.11930-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob writes: > > Well, Rawhide boots. I sure wish I knew what the authors intended by saying > "physical bus". I don't seems quite correct since we seem to have two I think its trying to map back to the DEQ SRM terminology where you can have a "bus 0" on many different hoses. Eg, its directly tied to the nexus & not behind a ppb. Does that make sense? > different "physical bus" zeros here. On puropose I very carefully don't have > overlapping cards (as in, same slot, different busses). Actually, that would be the most interesting to test. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14773.14047.750044.76586>