Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:18:59 -0700
From:      Chuck Yerkes <chuck+bsd@sept2002.snew.com>
To:        "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, tech-security@netbsd.org, misc@openbsd.org
Subject:   Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
Message-ID:  <20020829231859.A31958@snew.com>
In-Reply-To: <87k7mamc2s.fsf@snark.piermont.com>; from perry@piermont.com on Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:08:27AM -0400
References:  <20020828200748.90964.qmail@mail.com> <3D6D3953.6090005@mukappabeta.de> <20020828224330.GE249@localhost> <87k7mamc2s.fsf@snark.piermont.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com):
> Mipam <mipam@ibb.net> writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:57:55PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> > > >and maybe we should update our rc scripts,
> > > >so that ssh-keygen generates at least 1280 Bit keys
...
> > I dont think its too much overrated and theoretical.
> I do. If someone with millions of dollars to spend on custom designed
> hardware wants to break into your computer, I assure you that

For just 1 million, I'll roll them a tape.  Hell, I'll mail it to them.
OTOH, we can certainly use SSH with OPIE.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020829231859.A31958>