Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:58:56 +0300 From: freebsd.current@clogic.com.ua To: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: OpenSSL 1.1.1 in 12.0 Message-ID: <2882482b58aff76fc02cfbfc2019968d@clogic.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <201810111502.w9BF2FY7006750@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> References: <20181009213425.GG61558@FreeBSD.org> <346b8805-f4d3-dc90-c882-d72f640b6a5c@protected-networks.net> <da38b23c14ec5621ec89eb3088b68650@clogic.com.ua> <201810111502.w9BF2FY7006750@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2018-10-11 18:02, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > freebsd.current@clogic.com.ua wrote: > >> Anyway, I think apps from ports need to use openssl from ports. > > No. Only if it's installed. If not, it's perfectly normal for a port > to use the base openssl - it's not a private-lib install. > > cheers, Jamie I mean it is good idea to use openssl from ports to build other ports that depend on openssl.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2882482b58aff76fc02cfbfc2019968d>