Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:19:25 +0200
From:      Vadim Belman <voland@lflat.org>
To:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: distributed natd
Message-ID:  <20010810121922.E47532@unlink.catpipe.net>
In-Reply-To: <200108100225.MAA23117@tungsten.austclear.com.au>; from ahl@austclear.com.au on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:25:04PM %2B1000
References:  <20010810032158.T3889@gnjilux.cc.fer.hr> <200108100225.MAA23117@tungsten.austclear.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:25:04PM +1000, Tony Landells wrote:

> > I'm not sure I understood correctly - what are you aiming for? The
> > performance increase due to two firewalls simultaneously processing
> > traffic or the reduncancy of having one firewall take over if the
> > other fails?
> 
> > If it's the latter, I believe there are simpler solutions than
> > rewriting natd. 
> 
> Mostly the latter, with an additional (side benefit) of the former.
> 
> We have several "long-term" connections for application services
> that go through our firewall(s).  At the moment if one of the firewalls
> went down we'd have a major exercise to change DNS, restart services,
> and so on to switch everything across.
> 
> If we were using "virtual" addresses then the switchover would be
> more or less transparent.
> 
> However, we don't have a one-to-one mapping between internal addresses
> and external addresses, so there is a chance that the mapping one
> firewall would choose wouldn't be the same as that chosen by the
> second.
> 
> Hence my suggestion.
> 
> The side benefit is that I could then look at, for example, using
> dynamic routing to get equal cost paths through each box for load
> sharing when they're both up.

	I would point you to http://www.f5.com. Price might be of some
concern here, of course, but BIG-IP is really good solution here.

-- 
    /Voland			Vadim Belman
				E-mail: voland@lflat.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010810121922.E47532>