Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:07:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Nikolay Dmukha <cosmic17@gmail.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf nat & ipfw kernel nat & ng_nat - what uses less computer resources? Message-ID: <29203466.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <slrni4864g.2bj1.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> References: <28778099.post@talk.nabble.com> <slrni4864g.2bj1.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for your reply. I think I`ll use ipfw kernel nat. But first I would like to test nat through iptables in Linux to compare the results. I read that in iptables there is some special option (config_ip_nf_conntract). It is very interesting for me what is the difference in work with and without this option. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/pf-nat---ipfw-kernel-nat---ng_nat---what-uses-less-computer-resources--tp28778099p29203466.html Sent from the freebsd-performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29203466.post>