Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:36:41 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD PortManager <portmgr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: m4-macros for different versions in /usr/local/share/aclocal? Message-ID: <3F32D479.4040100@liwing.de> In-Reply-To: <1060287238.721.58.camel@gyros> References: <3F32B0D2.80002@liwing.de> <1060287238.721.58.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07.08.2003 22:13, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 16:04, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>
>> Hi,
[...]
>> One step could be, putting the aclocal self related macros
>> into a directory which is ever named as the aclocal
>> /usr/local/share/aclocal{14,15,17}/ version and put port
>> additions ever to /usr/local/share/aclocal/. Or the ports
>> put their additions to /usr/local/share/aclocal/${port}/
>
>
> I like this syntax better.
>
>> and eg. USE_LIBTOOL extends ACLOCAL_SEARCH_DIR to according
>> directory. ACLOCAL_ARGS will be extended by the resulting
>> search path, each dir prepended by the '-I' parameter
>> (using REINPLACE).
>>
>> The consequence would be, that each of those ports must
>> have a USE_${PORT} equivalent und bsd.port.mk (or included
>> .mk of it, eg. bsd.gnome.mk).
>>
>> What does the rest of FreeBSD ports people think about that?
>
>
> I agree with this, and I have suggested it to Ade. That is one of the
When did you? Did he answer your recognization?
> hang ups I'm running into with anjuta-devel.
Oh, good. Somewhere to steal the solution from :-)
> Joe
Jens
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F32D479.4040100>