Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:28:58 +0100 From: Simon Barner <barner@in.tum.de> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net>, nork@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper Message-ID: <20040218112858.GG74292@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> In-Reply-To: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adam Weinberger wrote: > Please reconsider removing flashpluginwrapper. I find it ludicrous that > I should have to manually apply a patch every time I want to update my > system. As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it to > remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support > linuxpluginwrapper. >=20 > This port is not deprecated. It is still of use to those of us who don't > wish to be manually applying patches to src all the time. Hi, I think you are referring to the libmap patch, that had to applied manually to FreeBSD -stable, before libmap had been MFC'ed on Feb 3rd: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/libexec/rtld-elf/libmap.c So, I guess that's the reason why flashpluginwrapper was marked deprecated. Perhaps the comment in the Makefile should be a bit more verbose and mention that libmap in -stable >=3D 490102. Simon --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAM0x6Ckn+/eutqCoRAtTUAKD2aCsjs6cxl1Dch+AyHfiSPBbhFQCfQdKk x/h8sLzBwLGOFWahMzvMXsY= =Tkxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040218112858.GG74292>