Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:16:09 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan <ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Debugging options for tomcat41ctl Message-ID: <200312151316.09312.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20031215121405.GS13737@starjuice.net> References: <20031213145040.GE13737@starjuice.net> <200312151309.47345.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> <20031215121405.GS13737@starjuice.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In fact I would like to either improve daemonctl or replace it completely. That way we don't have to maintain 2 systems... Ernst On maandag 15 december 2003 13:14, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2003/12/15 13:09), Ernst de Haan wrote: > > > My question, then, is why are you imposing this feature requirement > > > on these ports? This feature isn't required by other ports that > > > offer services. > > > > I don't remember the exact history of things. All I do know is that > > people may rely on this now. And it's an improvement over su(do). > > Well it's certainly not an improvement over sudo; sudo has a rich ACL > language for specifying who can and can't do what. > > Given that you have to start Tomcat _without_ daemonctl if you want > debugging support, and given that the primary purpose of daemonctl is to > make it easy for developers to stop and start the service without being > root, I suggest that we reimplement the existing rc.d script without > using daemonctl, and leave daemonctl installed for folks who want it. > > Ciao, > Sheldon. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200312151316.09312.ernst.dehaan>