Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:50:10 -0500 From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mailing List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pkg install: what is the "first" repository? Message-ID: <4C903D47-8D62-4986-B8E6-EB24DCE49E3E@conundrum.com> In-Reply-To: <52D8D27B.2030804@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <48811877-E688-4E0F-AF26-57C1C0135314@conundrum.com> <52D8D27B.2030804@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 17, 2014, at 01:49 , Matthew Seaman = <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > Note that there are changes in the pipeline which will make a > significant difference to the way pkg selects which repository to pull = a > package from, as part of a complete revision of how dependency solving > works. Yeah, I can think of cases where the current selection rules would = result in breakage without significant manual intervention. For one = thing, it would be beneficial if, for any package that has dependencies, = pkg preferred getting the dependencies from the same repo as the = original package, regardless of any other ordering rules. What=92s the best place to watch for those changes making it to release? = Is there a PR I can pay attention to?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C903D47-8D62-4986-B8E6-EB24DCE49E3E>