Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:55:45 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ?
Message-ID:  <200406090955.49190.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org>
References:  <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040609124308.GC11475@green.homeunix.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 08:43 am, Brian Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:16:30PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > [...]
> > The change proposed is more or less to do:
> > 	s/dev_t/struct cdev */
> > 	s/udev_t/dev_t/
> > over all the kernel sources (366 files or so).
> > [....]
>
> One yes vote, please.  The dev_t structure is not treated as opaque,
> so as long as people are going to->dereference it, it deserves to be
> a struct *.

Seconded.

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406090955.49190.jhb>