Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:35:42 -0700 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Tom Butterworth <buttie@mac.com> Subject: Re: ImageMagick-5.5.7.16 Message-ID: <200407150935.42419.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <20040715120434.77d7d0b1@localhost> References: <640CB64E-D650-11D8-9DDC-003065C49BA8@mac.com> <200407150524.42761.kstewart@owt.com> <20040715120434.77d7d0b1@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 15 July 2004 09:04 am, epilogue wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:24:42 -0700 > > Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 15 July 2004 04:16 am, Tom Butterworth wrote: > > > Thanks for the advice, I decided to go down the portupgrade route > > > in any event. However one of the ImageMagick-6.0.2.7 dependencies > > > is XFree86-libraries-4.2.0_1 and when it gets to this point in > > > the portupgrade it keeps coming back with the error > > > > > > make: don't know how to make includes. Stop > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > > > any ideas of how to cure this would be much appreciated as i have > > > hit a brick wall > > > > Could that be because the current version is now > > XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_7 > > > > If it is trying to build 4.2, your INDEXs are probably out of date. > > > > Kent > > yep. tom, it sounds as though kent may be right here. you should > probably cvsup a fresh ports tree, then 'portdb -Uu'. (though you > could probably get away with just 'portdb -Uu', no sup) in fact, if > you're not already doing it, you should be issuing 'portsdb-Uu' after > every cvsup. this will synch your INDEX with the ports you've just > cvsup'd. > > note: recently, there has been a lot of talk about how 'portsdb -Uu' > takes so long to run and how everyone wished it could be done a > little more quickly. well, some kind individual has developed a > program which does just that (/usr/ports/sysutils/portindex). it is > still fairly new and you may run into the odd kink as it continues to > stabilitize, yet the program makes synchronizing INDEX significantly > faster (except, perhaps, on it's first run, because it builds its > database). I just started trying portindex. It is currently producing an 0 length=20 INDEX and a 2048 byte INDEX.db on my 4.10-stable system. Kent > > > hope this helps, > epi > > > > Thanks Tom > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, at 10:05 PM, epilogue wrote: > > > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:37:01 -0400 > > > > > > > > Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> wrote: > > > >> Tom Butterworth wrote: > > > >>> I was having trouble with the package ImageMagick-5.5.7.16 > > > >>> permissions > > > >>> wise so i decided to remove and re install it. Unfortunately > > > >>> when using > > > >>> pkg_add command it gets latest version which requires a lot > > > >>> of other up-to date dependents. Where is it possible to get > > > >>> ImageMagick-5.5.7.16 > > > >>> or do i have to go through removing and updating all the > > > >>> dependent packages and use latest ImageMagick? > > > > > > > > in /usr/ports/distfiles, do you still have a copy of the > > > > version you want? > > > > if so, you feeding the /path/filename to pkg_add should, in > > > > theory, work. > > > > > > > > to my knowledge, vanilla pkg_add (ie. with no switches) > > > > shouldn't be pulling down a new version. normally, that only > > > > happens when you use the -r (remote) switch. > > > > > > > > you might also want to look at the > > > > /usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade. i > > > > haven't used it myself. i presume that it requires for all the > > > > older versions of the necessary files (ie. dependencies) to > > > > still be available, > > > > but it is certainly worth investigating. > > > > > > > > good luck, > > > > epi > > > > > > > >> If you don't want to upgrade all of the dependencies required > > > >> by the precompiled package, you'll have to install the > > > >> software from sources by > > > >> hand. > > > >> > > > >> Using portupgrade to keep up-to-date is probably easier... > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> -Chuck > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > >> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > e : tom@semiotica.co.uk > > > w : http://www.semesys.com/ > > > http://www.semiotica.co.uk > > > a : semioticaNewMedia > > > PO box 13 > > > Ashton U Lyne > > > Lancashire > > > OL7 9FY > > > =A0 > > > Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail > > > is for the intended recipient(s) alone. It may contain privileged > > > and confidential information that is exempt from disclosure under > > > English law and if you are not an intended recipient, you must > > > not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you > > > have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately. > > > If this message is being transmitted over the Internet, be aware > > > that it may be intercepted by third parties. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407150935.42419.kstewart>