Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 23:19:40 +0200 From: George Liaskos <geo.liaskos@gmail.com> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r219385 build error. Message-ID: <AANLkTimJpsr=38UPswCXUmajNixTs1qS-8FxT36xAK4V@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110307205957.GA47557@freebsd.org> References: <AANLkTikc-Z9mjmQ7EWnWdqz297hHQ_Kt2k9z05FaNv-y@mail.gmail.com> <20110307205957.GA47557@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>What process did you follow to get here? I did a make toolchain followed by make buildworld. > that's because the latest gcc commits have support for core2 and thus it no > longer is being expanded to nocona. please note that having core2 in make.conf > has always been *wrong*. hence the need to reset it to nocona. > the best way to fix this would be to set CPUYTYPE?=native. if you want core2 > support now's the chance to actually get it. just update world and you can use > CPUTYPE?=core2 and this time it *really* is supported. ;) I saw the relevant commits about core2, this is the reason i decided to do a rebuild. I didn't know that core2 was wrong, it's in the make.conf documentation, "native" it's not and after serious googling i found out that i should actually avoid it. I always believed that core2 was there [make.conf] as a future proof upgrade path for when the base toolchain actually supports core2. So, should i use native cputype?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimJpsr=38UPswCXUmajNixTs1qS-8FxT36xAK4V>