Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:48:07 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" <jnagyjr1978@gmail.com> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org, Erwin Lansing <erwin@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: sysutils/fusefs-httpfs Message-ID: <CADLo838TxPnqhU2cFSX1TGJVdMbp55h=VNSJBAr%2BtdNsR4XmDw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5123CAE8.90107@gmail.com> References: <5123ca0a.1aac68.41d9f052@portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org> <5123CAE8.90107@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 February 2013 18:56, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr <jnagyjr1978@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/19/13 12:52, erwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> >> ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous >> one ** >> >> For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance >> that >> version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over >> time. >> Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for >> more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade >> and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH. >> >> Please fix any errors as soon as possible. >> >> The ports tree was updated at Tue Feb 19 2013 18:36:41 UTC. >> >> - *sysutils/fusefs-httpfs* <ports@FreeBSD.org>: fusefs-httpfs-2.0.1.5 < >> fusefs-httpfs-2.06.08.26 > > I have a similar issue with ruby: > > ruby-1.9.3.327,1 > succeeds port (port has 1.9,1) > > CC'd to ruby@ I'm guessing you're using portversion? Is the pkgdb up to date? [crees@pegasus]~% make -f /usr/ports/lang/ruby19/Makefile -VPORTVERSION 1.9.3.385 Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838TxPnqhU2cFSX1TGJVdMbp55h=VNSJBAr%2BtdNsR4XmDw>