Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:00:26 +0100 From: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AR9280 and noisy environments, please test Message-ID: <1429063.uVeFgxTZ8j@snifi> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokMuG3iSL78JryafLF2m28=f2QPtqwApT5Akf4DXDFJhA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmokMuG3iSL78JryafLF2m28=f2QPtqwApT5Akf4DXDFJhA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1709753.D0aCPZml2j Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Dnia =C5=9Broda 02 listopad 2011 20:17:06 Adrian Chadd pisze: > What I'd like you guys to try: >=20 > * update if_ath_tx! > * run the ar9280 in hostap or STA mode, it doesn't matter what, but > enable NF and ANI debugging: > # sysctl dev.ath.X.hal.debug=3D0x28 > * let it run for a couple of minutes, so it gets a couple of NF > calibrations (which occur every 30 seconds) and then report that to > me. That's log1 >=20 > What you'll likely see is: >=20 > * ANI goes bezerk with OFDM/CCK errors, and tries bumping up some > things (spur immunity, firstep); > * the NF values calibrated are either crazy looking (higher than -80)= , > or chain 0 / chain 1 values are wildly mismatching; >=20 > Then, try changing the longcal value from 30 to 1, and email me two o= r > so minutes of logging output. That's log2 > Finally, set the CCA threshold to something manual, and rerun tests > for a couple minutes: >=20 > # sysctl dev.ath.X.config.cca=3D-85 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 > Adrian And that's log3 My env shouldn't be too noisy but last patch helped a lot with stabilit= y. Kind Regards, Maciek --nextPart1709753.D0aCPZml2j--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1429063.uVeFgxTZ8j>