Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:37:01 +0200 From: Adrian Gschwend <ktk@netlabs.org> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI performance Message-ID: <487B486D.3000206@netlabs.org> In-Reply-To: <E1KHJEp-000ChB-4N@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <g57kqh$imm$1@ger.gmane.org> <E1KHJEp-000ChB-4N@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Danny Braniss wrote: > the patches were for -STABLE, and I haven't seen them, but > before the patches, try increasing the tag opening, ie > camcontrol tags daX -N128 > or via iscontrol (and yes it's not idiot proof, nor is is it > developer proof :-) ok ;) Did that (camcontrol), with the following result: Operations performed: 6006 Read, 3994 Write, 12800 Other = 22800 Total Read 93.844Mb Written 62.406Mb Total transferred 156.25Mb (1.4742Mb/sec) 94.35 Requests/sec executed which is already a lot better but still below the IO of the local disk. Should I try more right now or should I wait for more progress in that? Does it make sense to switch to -CURRENT for that? cu Adrian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIe0htqpMUYrZbQBERAvBpAJ9eTtDCdTJYcF2v1DtAr3vTSdartgCgoL1G aWEdX1ZHHl8pUZ5O87xJf2g= =EvmR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?487B486D.3000206>