Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:59:34 +0300 From: Ruslan Kovtun <yalur@mail.ru> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on backup fileserver - RAM usage Message-ID: <200810142359.34263.yalur@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <16C9B293-7BBE-496D-BA0B-DC78299186ED@corp.spry.com> References: <48F334A0.3080005@quip.cz> <48F3B8D6.6060309@quip.cz> <16C9B293-7BBE-496D-BA0B-DC78299186ED@corp.spry.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I tried to apply this patch (zfs_20080727.patch) but I have found several errors (see below). Is this problem with patch or I need manualy apply these changes? Patching file cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/sys/zfs_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #11 failed at 347. Patching file cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/sys/zfs_context.h using Plan A... Hunk #11 failed at 347. Patching file sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ctldir.c using Plan A... Hunk #26 failed at 1053. Patching file sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_replay.c using Plan A... Hunk #18 failed at 766. Patching file sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c using Plan A... Hunk #82 failed at 3478. Patching file sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_znode.c using Plan A... Hunk #6 failed at 136. Hunk #13 failed at 560. Hunk #18 failed at 759. Hunk #20 failed at 877. Hunk #26 failed at 1336. Patching file sys/kern/kern_jail.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 34. ____________________________________________________ > On Oct 13, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > Matt Simerson wrote: > >> It all depends on your workload. If you work your backup serves > >> hard (as I do, backing up thousands of OS instances), you'll have > >> significant reliability problems using FreeBSD 7.1 and ZFS. After > >> a crash that corrupted my file systems, I have moved to 8-head > >> with Pawel's latest patch. > >> My backup servers have between 16 and 24 disks each. The ones with > >> 16GB of RAM crash far less frequently than my server that has only > >> 2GB. That one is getting upgraded soon. > >> Matt > > > > I am planning to backup about 10-15 servers (mainly webservers and > > few mailservers) and not expecting high load. > > Did 8-current with the latest ZFS patch fixed all stability problems? > > > > Thanks for suggestions to both of you. > > > > Miroslav Lachman > > No, there are still stability issues under heavy load. The are just > far less frequent under 8-current than under 7. I couldn't keep my > systems up for more than 2 days before switching to 8. Running 8-head > was better, but so far the best available configuration is 8-head with > "the patch" applied. > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ________________ Ruslan Kovtun mailto: yalur@mail.ru mob: +380503557878, +380919015095 ICQ: 277696182
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810142359.34263.yalur>