Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 07:01:46 -0800 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r400565 - head/security/pam_krb5 Message-ID: <201511021501.tA2F1kAp070299@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:42:55 %2B0100." <5637766F.6000404@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <5637766F.6000404@marino.st>, John Marino writes:
> On 11/2/2015 3:37 PM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > =
> > Looks like the tarball (port) never supported heimdal in ports in the =
first
> =
> > place. From ./configure:
> =
> Why did it build before then?
> =
> =
> > =
> > ac_fn_c_check_member "$LINENO" "krb5_creds" "session" =
> > "ac_cv_member_krb5_creds_s
> > ession" "
> > #if HAVE_KRB5_H
> > # include <krb5.h>
> > #else
> > # include <krb5/krb5.h>
> > #endif
> > =
> > ./portable/krb5.h has the same code.
> > =
> > Hiemdal in ports installs krb5.h ${LOCALBASE}/include/heimdal/krb5. I =
can =
> > remove the option for now or (better) we can symlink =
> > ${LOCALBASE}/include/heimdal to ${LOCALBASE}/include/krb5 in the heimd=
al =
> > port. See attached patch.
> =
> Heimdal ports is the only option that builds in dports, so removing it
> means removing it from dports.
> =
> krb.h is there (poudriere testport -i) :
> =
> # ls /usr/local/include/heimdal/krb5.h
> /usr/local/include/heimdal/krb5.h
> =
> It should configure, right?
Nope. ls /usr/local/include/krb5.h /usr/local/include/krb5/krb5.h
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201511021501.tA2F1kAp070299>