Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:56:41 -0500
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 113033 for review
Message-ID:  <200701171256.45889.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070117100753.s34xp2kc1wks40w4@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <200701162346.l0GNkSOi063600@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070117100753.s34xp2kc1wks40w4@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 04:07 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> (from Tue, 16 Jan 2007 
23:46:28 GMT):
> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=113033
> >
> > Change 113033 by jkim@jkim_hammer on 2007/01/16 23:45:49
> >
> > 	MFi386: iopl(2)
> >
> > 	This fixes LTP iopl01 and iopl02 on amd64.
>
> Is the thread stuff MD? If not, is there something else which is
> MD?

This is not thread stuff. ;-) It is MD because i386 has eflags while 
amd64 has rflags, which is 64-bit extended eflags.

Jung-uk Kim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701171256.45889.jkim>