Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:02:52 -0500
From:      Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org>
To:        Dennis Melentyev <dennis.melentyev@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Raaf <raaf@zen.mooo.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Cannot mount Sony Ericsson mobile phone, msdosfs too restrictive?
Message-ID:  <4689BC5C.90909@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <b84edfa10707021332o6ed8bfd8p5f08aec4826fe05f@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4687FF75.3000108@zen.mooo.com>	<b84edfa10707011305g4cffb298q70c3507f75121799@mail.gmail.com>	<47a4f3080707011454m6e06c97bu4764b32a65160ad6@mail.gmail.com>	<468825A9.80200@zen.mooo.com>	<b84edfa10707021330h42936d92x874acf8e900caffa@mail.gmail.com> <b84edfa10707021332o6ed8bfd8p5f08aec4826fe05f@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dennis Melentyev wrote:
> Can't confirm, but it seems like formating card with phone will give
> you FAT12 even on 1Gb card. (Not volunteering to reformat my "player")
> :)


It would be useful to some people to have access to a FAT12 formatted 
file system that is >32MB.  Can you (or someone else) dd the flash to a 
file (the 64MB file is file), and then gzip it?  Preferably a freshly 
formatted fat12 would be best.

Eric


> 2007/7/2, Dennis Melentyev <dennis.melentyev@gmail.com>:
>> Hi!
>>
>> 2007/7/2, Raaf <raaf@zen.mooo.com>:
>> > Brian Chu wrote:
>> > > Raaf,
>> > >
>> > > What's the size of the memory stick?  Is it 32MB like Dennis has?
>> It was 64MB card also. :)
>> AFAIR, FAT12 is just not correct format for disks larger than 32Mb.
>> It has to use clusters not handled by original MSDOS in this case.
>>
>> So, my answer is: SE just use wrong FAT.
>>
>> But, meanwile, it should be ok to allow this insanity be handled.
>> Despite I'd rather use smaller clusters for such a tiny drive.
>>
>> > >
>> >
>> > It's a 64MB memory stick using FAT12.
>>
>> MSDOS 3.3 will go crazy with that :)
>>
>> >
>> > > The check for the field that affected you isn't critical to msdosfs'
>> > > operation, but the field itself is specified to be non-zero.
>> > > Konstantin, is it alright to remove this field?
>> > >
>> >
>> > It seems there are more people having problems with the sanity checking
>> > code of msdosfs, see also this related pr:
>> >
>> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93860
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Dennis Melentyev
>>
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4689BC5C.90909>