Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:26:29 +0200 From: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com> To: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> Cc: misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD Message-ID: <021E6A5D-F1BC-47DD-B860-F0AAC588F34C@verweg.com> In-Reply-To: <4A3B7E71.5000003@riscworks.net> References: <735E59909DEB44AF92825EA7C65CF430@ionicoffice.ionic.co.uk> <00265389C30B444288C246DF37651D0C249024DD1B@server-02.playsafesa.com> <h1forf$3lr$1@ger.gmane.org> <6101e8c40906190408h5b6a4496td12e2b9e4872459e@mail.gmail.com> <f663ee356bc7ad36ab5c63c0a4693f89.squirrel@www.thephinix.org> <4A3B7E71.5000003@riscworks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 Jun 2009, at 14:02, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and >> vice versa. Above all, they contribute to the genetic diversity in the operating system pool. Which is a good thing. - Ruben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?021E6A5D-F1BC-47DD-B860-F0AAC588F34C>