Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:28:44 +0000
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: github ports
Message-ID:  <20210110192844.abddfcdbe99975b4b15c56f1@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <E79DB347-6EFA-458F-99B2-3E0177FB2AE5@kicp.uchicago.edu>
References:  <20210110133605.6538dfd5@dismail.de> <CADnZ6B=Yy_fFUtAds3HjKZT10wNhGA6PzkYayc0mLNGoK_ug7Q@mail.gmail.com> <E79DB347-6EFA-458F-99B2-3E0177FB2AE5@kicp.uchicago.edu>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:14:58 -0600
Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote:

> Just for my education: is there any advantage in using git like that
> instead of portsnap?

	With git you get the full history, with portsnap you just get the
current (snap) state. If you don't want the history portsnap is almost
certainly faster.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210110192844.abddfcdbe99975b4b15c56f1>