Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:10 +0000 From: Joao Barros <joao.barros@gmail.com> To: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0 Message-ID: <70e8236f0511090513q2db9168by22b9ab741f8962c2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43716381.4010601@roq.com> References: <70e8236f0511050457s5ce6d8batf805fbc9edd91360@mail.gmail.com> <43716381.4010601@roq.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/9/05, Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> wrote: > Joao Barros wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Last month I started a thread[1] on current@ about this, but I guess I > >should have done it here, my apologies for that. > > > >After my initial post I did some more testing and I'm going to start > >clean here with all my findings :) > > > >I started with Samba 3 installed on a PIII 733MHz with fxp (82559) and > >a RAID5 consisting of 4 drives connected to an amr. > >Performance reading or writing was poor, around 5.5MB/s measured on > >two Windows clients and iostat never topped that by much. > >cpu was mbufs were available and there were no IRQs shared. > >To dismiss the amr out of the question I tried with a local IDE > >attached yielding the same results. > >I then tested the same on a machine I have at work, an HP Proliant > >server, Pentium 4 3.06GHz, used SMP instead of GENERIC to use HTT. > >I could get 8MB/s with 2 read or write simultaneous operations. With 1 > >operation I still can only get 6MB/s > >This machine has 1GB ram and after copying a 700MB file to it it was all= cached. > >A copy to dev/null took 1 second. > >A copy via samba took the same time as if there was no cache for it. > >iostat always showed 0.0 during the operation so that pretty much > >takes disks, controllers, IO out of the picture. > > > >Both machines have cpu, IO and mbufs to spare and they still can't use > >them. Why? > > > > > >[1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-October/0571= 16.html > > > >-- > >Joao Barros > >_______________________________________________ > > > > > Sometime in the near future I will be building a Samba3 server and I > plan to get everything I can get out of it, I expect to uncover a lot of > needed tweaks to get it going fast. > My guess would be to you try at least turning on polling, also if its > only 100mbit Ethernet/switches you got then I guess you cant expect much > either. > > Mike 3 years ago I had a linux machine with a less powerfull cpu maxing out the interface with SMB transfers. In all available enviroments under a 100mbit switch I can max out the interfaces using Windows or Linux. On my particular enviroment (a 3com switch at home) I can max out the interfaces doing transfers between my laptop and my home pc, both running XP. -- Joao Barros
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70e8236f0511090513q2db9168by22b9ab741f8962c2>