Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:20 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Server - To 5.x or Not To 5.x Message-ID: <200506141459.20488.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20050614135828.M90456@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20050614135828.M90456@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1148257.5ZUNMHZEpB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:05, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Is there anyone out there using 5-STABLE and UNIONFS that are happy with > it, or is it still very problematic? This probably isn't the heavy-duty example you wanted, but... I run 5.4-STABLE on a laptop, and mount /usr/ports/distfiles read-only from= =20 another server via smbfs. Then, I use unionfs to=20 mount /usr/ports/localdistfiles above /usr/ports/distfiles. This is hardly= =20 in the same league as running a database or mailserver through unionfs, but= =20 it certainly seems stable enough for my limited needs. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1148257.5ZUNMHZEpB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBCrzcY5sRg+Y0CpvERApHAAJ9I32Ohpcm5D2+s92i5jCa1gkpC+wCePKuX en6k9YXvj9DaCZ0+OkK21is= =4pwb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1148257.5ZUNMHZEpB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506141459.20488.kirk>