Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:48:07 +0200 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: "Burmeister\, Robert" <Robert.Burmeister@utoledo.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: harfbuzz-icu, harfbuzz, webkit-gtk2, webkit2-gtk3, libreoffice, firefox Message-ID: <poaa-o8hk-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <k20i-pniy-wny@FreeBSD.org> (Jan Beich's message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:37:57 %2B0200") References: <81D84A650858BA40BF6936408052E6BC0138263988@msgdb11.utad.utoledo.edu> <k20i-pniy-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice
>> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa
>> /tmp/portupgrade20170928-17949-1u69e9v env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade
>> UPGRADE_PORT=libreoffice-5.3.6_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=5.3.6_1 make
>> ** Fix the problem and try again.
>> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
>> ! editors/libreoffice (libreoffice-5.3.6_1) (configure error)
>
> Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building
> editors/libreoffice?
print/harfbuzz already has PORTREVISION defined with the same value as
print/harfbuzz-icu. I didn't notice on rebase because the ports are
different and ${PORTSDIR}/Tools/scripts/bump-revision.sh isn't smart
enough about to look inside master port.
Sorry for the rant.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?poaa-o8hk-wny>