Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:22:11 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 216864] cpow(), cpowf(), and cpowl() need better implementations
Message-ID:  <bug-216864-99-51VVJzyHtW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216864-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-216864-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216864

Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Closed                      |Open
            Summary|C11 conformance: cpow(),    |cpow(), cpowf(), and
                   |cpowf, and cpowl are        |cpowl() need better
                   |missing                     |implementations
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #5 from Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@freebsd.org> ---
Retitle and reopen (the previous one causes too much confusion).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216864-99-51VVJzyHtW>