Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:37:13 -0700
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>, Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile src/include Makefile src/release  Makefile src/release/picobsd/build Makefile.mfs  src/release/picobsd/custom Makefile.mfs src/release/picobsd/dial  Makefile.mfs src/release/picobsd/install Makefile.mfs
Message-ID:  <397E24A9.81AA57BA@cup.hp.com>
References:  <200007252213.PAA34677@netplex.com.au> <200007252322.RAA24596@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> Right.  We should have FTS_PHYSICAL by default (which is easy to do
> with Andrey's changes).  We should also provide a way to cause the
> mtree to do the old behavior if the user needs it (and they will for
> sybolic links for things like /tmp).  So two changes need to happen.
> Once, the mtree should be changed and two the build system needs a
> minor tweak to allow a MTREE_FLAGS parameter to mtree.

Andrey changed the default and provided a -L switch. Nothing wrong with
that. Why *exactly* do we need the build system to use FTS_LOGICAL
instead of the mtree-default? I guess I'm confused, why having a default
of FTS_PHYSICAL is ok, except for the build process...

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
  mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org
  tel:  (408) 447-4222


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?397E24A9.81AA57BA>