Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:12:35 +0200 From: Johannes Jost Meixner <johannes@meixner.dk> To: =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgTGFkYW4=?= <rene@freebsd.org>, Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVE-2015-7547 and linux-f10-* ports? Message-ID: <56CB3373.7050100@meixner.dk> In-Reply-To: <CADL2u4htEzVn8p-wTwmzQOZr2tttCyFNVEHzV48uN27YO82pog@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADL2u4gFJEz1APFeoDJ=xO-ze3%2BaZAWvJqqy1G3WZfD4OHg5uQ@mail.gmail.com> <86mvqxlvr3.fsf@desk.des.no> <20160220223655.GA86662@chd.heemeyer.club> <CADL2u4hqZh7RyK=hkak1%2BVkM4-F58NexGW=_vp1mxVrTwYA31w@mail.gmail.com> <20160220234258.GA1377@chd.heemeyer.club> <CADL2u4htEzVn8p-wTwmzQOZr2tttCyFNVEHzV48uN27YO82pog@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/21/16 06:37 PM, René Ladan wrote: > > Op 21 feb. 2016 17:33 schreef "Chagin Dmitry" <dchagin@freebsd.org > <mailto:dchagin@freebsd.org>>: >> >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:48:12PM +0100, Ren?? Ladan wrote: >>> 2016-02-20 23:36 GMT+01:00 Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org > <mailto:dchagin@freebsd.org>>: >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:27:12PM +0100, Dag-Erling >>>> Sm??rgrav wrote: >>>>> Ren?? Ladan <rene@freebsd.org <mailto:rene@freebsd.org>> >>>>> writes: >>>>>> in light of CVE-2015-7547 and various other security > vulnerabilities, >>>>>> is there any desire to keep the linux-f10-* ports? >>>>> >>>>> I don't think we can just svn rm them. IIRC, c6 doesn't >>>>> work with a stock FreeBSD 9 kernel. We would have to >>>>> issue an EN to update the Linuxulator. I'm not sure how >>>>> much work is involved. >>>>> >>>> does we have 9.4 plans? if so, I will merge Linuxulator to >>>> the > stable/9. >>> >>> I don't think there are plans for a 9.4-RELEASE. But xmj@ >>> confirmed on the other thread that linux-c6 at least builds >>> fine on 9.3-RELEASE with the compat.linux.osrelease sysctl >>> bumped to 2.6.32 (not sure if all functionality is there in >>> that case). >> builds != works I already did that. It works, once you read the pkg-message and follow its instructions -- that is, bump the compat.linux.osrelease sysctl to 2.6.18, and maybe load linprocfs (depends on what you do with it..) Given that there were no functional changes between 9.x and 10.x in terms of linux emu, that has to be enough. > > I know, I will test if it works. > > René > - -- Johannes Meixner | FreeBSD Committer xmj@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~xmj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWyzNwAAoJEElqnXBiUNQCIu8QAJLSnL7jijBUlx2h0/kv9OWv eOU+vQ3BfWlGQV5J/jpj/uTSSkbjNyt8FjWStSsXvk3mV9KmRM6ksHU7HraIOFsQ sWJhfIgGroh02I90i0goNwhdVP6GuMESY1NZ/jBUYjP9+ZFI+WKPSX6tLLDY916V 4JQ0cz3AQjBLaQMqzjO/4jx5/6Y5J/IfHZeuNY9oTdpNbZb46IDTQ8uvrgRWo2cJ pTiF5XpcL2WM09gTNzb5Fl1fEft3TJgcDkaJ0qL2FLE10mB3/u8zXBQsUbQvNGWD da8mR75Hl1YqAu6BHaZCAvokAdz6L4WvR0FHcLgGwTUckqd5hMCQklBcScfjH2ew 6wRu3nzJT8WJtfF6qwqhSh6yjUMjmAn7JRy4wpqjIKwD1Ou1DB+TIeiLFCifeIvn xkhG4vOqb3Ah5f04JDg50qWrZEEboBOo+linPfEtwHbynYYexYnggrBGMnM6e55o q2+7K8FKDbEeYhA8mCRU9IdDA7mlSQkHvRYBvA5ftsC+A97Z3zqiPnmiiU1rz4TM oaSlzAEEGpGcCeTEkac5bGt2B8jZmvJEMcCtVZ+bwRPG9kHDOmvwlxZJqCPU183/ 6reN42LxUih35h2bKBeJhq7KFZ6RnZulestDIcMva2y9qzMHUP+R1Aa5pZBofoJ1 Crlx3/38LD6dwBMsjLzM =c92m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56CB3373.7050100>