Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:08:32 -0400
From:      Chris Brennan <xaero@xaerolimit.net>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Fwd: free sco unix
Message-ID:  <BANLkTi=EoCWdhEsaXry5h18%2B-=9U1hjiSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110616010656.GC23541@gmail.com>
References:  <4DF9174F.50708@danskdatacenter.dk> <20110615210830.GB23541@gmail.com> <4DF92D0F.3030008@danskdatacenter.dk> <20110616010656.GC23541@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Chris Brennan <xaero@xaerolimit.net>
Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: free sco unix
To: Thomas Hansen <tlh@danskdatacenter.dk>

'y' and 't' are too close in mutt :(


* Thomas Hansen <tlh@danskdatacenter.dk> [2011-06-16 00:07:11 +0200]:

This was off-list, redirecting back.

> but does freeBSD and unixware use the same core/kernel

1) Don't top post. Bad form and not list policy. See signature for why.

2) No, The UNIX Core/Kernel is propritary, see my last e-mail

3) Obey Reply-to: headers. Adjust your headers to properly reply to the
list and not individually.

--
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/
> GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8  9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C)
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=EoCWdhEsaXry5h18%2B-=9U1hjiSw>